I was told that I would be given all the support I needed, would have a classroom assistant with me in the mornings and could meet with the key stage 1 co-ordinator to plan all the afternoons for the rest of the term. I was virtually begged to come and accepted on the understanding that they knew I had no training in that area. This, I was led to believe, would be no problem due to the team effort that would get me through it!
Things did not go well. Idiscovered that the KS1 co-ordinator had no more understanding of how to pan for reception class than I did and we managed to plan only about 10 days' work. My assistant's time was cut to one afternoon a week. Through this, most of the staff tried to help but clearly the support was not as much as I had been promised.
I was given leave to observe another reception-class teacher and a literacy specialist came in to observe me and give advice. Unsurprisingly, my teaching was not "up to scratch" and the adviser (as I understand it from the school) told the Cheshire LEA that there was an unsuitably-qualified teacher in a school about to undergo an Ofsted inspection. One Friday, about 4pm, I was told not to come back on Monday.
The head then "borrowed" a teacher from her husband's school who taught the class for four weeks while the inspection took place.
It was a bad management decision to take me on in the first place and I was naive to do it. I wonder what the normal procedure is when schools have not secured cover during an inspection for teachers on long-term sick leave. Surely not all schools borrow teachers!