If social mobility relied on grammars, it would be at a standstill

Letter to the editor
17th July 2009, 1:00am

Share

If social mobility relied on grammars, it would be at a standstill

https://www.tes.com/magazine/archive/if-social-mobility-relied-grammars-it-would-be-standstill-2

Stephen Pollard might inform himself better if he actually looked at the current reality of a wholly selective area such as Kent (Grammars: working-class pupils’ last hope, July 10). Working-class children do not get a look-in at the grammar schools here. The 11-plus test is taken in September of Year 6 - so it is a 10-plus test. Does Mr Pollard believe that testing children at 10 years old is reliable or valid?

Many parents spend vast amounts of money on private tutoring or private primary education to ensure that their child passes the test. The wage packet of parents is the biggest determinant of who gets into a grammar school. Meanwhile, 70 per cent of Kent’s pupils begin secondary school as “failures” and go to secondary moderns. Over a third of Kent secondary schools fall below the Government’s 30 per cent threshold for GCSE results.

Social selection and educational apartheid is reinforced by the grammar school system in Kent. Mr Pollard is living in la-la land if he thinks otherwise.

Rebecca Matthews, Kent parent.

Want to keep reading for free?

Register with Tes and you can read two free articles every month plus you'll have access to our range of award-winning newsletters.

Keep reading for just £1 per month

You've reached your limit of free articles this month. Subscribe for £1 per month for three months and get:

  • Unlimited access to all Tes magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters
Nothing found
Recent
Most read
Most shared