It was a question, not a proposal

Tes Editorial

YOUR article "GCSE failures could be teachers" (July 27) was factually wrong.

The Teacher Training Agency (TTA) has not proposed lifting the requirement of GCSE grade C or better in English, maths and science.

In the consultation document, the exact opposite is stated.

However, a question in the response booklet asks if this requirement should be lifted, and was placed because of comments the TTA heard during the monitoring and review of Circular 498.

This question in no way constitutes a TTA proposal, although the response could, as a part of the consultation process, lead to a lifting of the requirement.

Ralph Tabberer

Chief executive

Teacher Training Agency

Register to continue reading for free

It only takes a moment and you'll get access to more news, plus courses, jobs and teaching resources tailored to you

Tes Editorial

Latest stories

Geoff Barton

Omicron, nativities and the DfE: Another fine mess

Schools are being told what to do by those with no concept of the reality of running a school - and it's only making an already tough situation a lot harder, explains Geoff Barton
Geoff Barton 3 Dec 2021
New headteachers - here are 9 things you need to know

Headteacher wellbeing and sources of 'streth'

Former headteacher Chris McDermott set out to find out the true causes of leader stress and support – and in doing so coined a whole new term, as he explains here
Chris McDermott 2 Dec 2021
Transdisciplinary learning: how to embed it in your school

Why you need a transdisciplinary curriculum

At the Aspirations Academies, six hours a week are dedicated to applied transdisciplinary learning - but how does it work? And should you apply something similar at your school?
Steve Kenning 2 Dec 2021