Letters extra: Weighting in vain?

17th October 2003, 1:00am

Share

Letters extra: Weighting in vain?

https://www.tes.com/magazine/archive/letters-extra-weighting-vain

Harry Brighouse is right to arguenbsp;for a low income weighting to fund schools ( Tricks for social mobility, The TES , 3.10.03 ).

Moreover as Peter Wilby points out in the same edition, the result of affirmative action - he proposes a top universities’ quota of places for schools in deprived areas - could be to leaven the socialnbsp; mixture of schools by atracting middle class parents.

The Netherlands, which has long had a weighting systemnbsp;for poor children and immigrant children,nbsp; shows that the funding advantage has to be significant to make a difference.nbsp;Researchers in New York State estimated a minimum of 10 per cent extra per pupil.

My guess, as an ex-local authority schools funding officer, is that it needs to be closer to 20 per cent. I reviewed these issues in a research paper for the North of England conference in 1997.

Martin Yarnit ,
Whitbourne,
Worcester

Want to keep reading for free?

Register with Tes and you can read two free articles every month plus you'll have access to our range of award-winning newsletters.

Keep reading for just £1 per month

You've reached your limit of free articles this month. Subscribe for £1 per month for three months and get:

  • Unlimited access to all Tes magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters
Recent
Most read
Most shared