Pros and cons of a 'themed' approach to the curriculum

David Lambert

There was an interesting juxtaposition of articles in The TES last week - "Geography is getting lost, MPs are told" and "Themed lessons get Ofsted thumbs down". Also last week, I met a number of teachers at a lecture, some of whom were disheartened by what was happening to their work.

When committed secondary teachers find themselves teaching "integrated studies" by diktat, they say they feel undervalued and misplaced. One felt passionately that pupils were getting "education lite".

The Geographical Association is very concerned at growing evidence that subjects are being replaced by ill-considered themes. The irony is that successful interdisciplinary work depends on strong subject specialism to prevent the mush that can so easily end up filling the curriculum space.

Such success requires much professional time, thought and commitment to get it right. There are no quick fixes.

David Lambert, Professor of geography education and chief executive of the Geographical Association, Sheffield

Register to continue reading for free

It only takes a moment and you'll get access to more news, plus courses, jobs and teaching resources tailored to you

David Lambert

Latest stories

We need a new acronym for SEND - because special educational needs and disabilities doesn't cover everything, writes Aidan Severs

Is it time for a new name for SEND?

We use the acronym SEND to describe a variety of needs - but it falls short of covering everything, says Aidan Severs
Aidan Severs 15 May 2021