Pupil profiles will reduce workloads, headteachers say

New reporting method for P7 and S3 gains support

Henry Hepburn

The introduction of pupil profiles at P7 and S3 should not add an extra layer of bureaucracy and could even reduce teachers' workload, it has been claimed.

Interest in how to produce profiles that encapsulate pupils' best achievements is growing - as was clear from a packed conference on "reporting and profiling" in Stirling, organised by ELT Consultants, last week.

A number of school leaders told TESS that they expected profiling, a key element in the national Building the Curriculum 5 document, to reduce demands on teachers.

But Irene Matier, past president of primary school leaders' union AHDS, counselled: "Don't get yourself into a position where you're doing something just because you've got to. Stand back and say, `Is this going to be used and is it useful for the young person?'"

Staff should not be prescriptive about what to include in the profiles, she added, although they should challenge youngsters who are unrealistic about the capabilities they have demonstrated.

Mrs Matier's own rule of thumb was: "It should be the child's decision what to put into the profile: what is the child proud of?"

Norman Emerson, assessment programme director at Education Scotland, flagged up a nascent problem: "It's really important that it's genuinely pupils' voices. Some of the language that the young people are using in the exemplars is quite technical, and almost teacherly."

The vision, said Highland quality improvement officer Dave McCartney, should be of an "ongoing, iterative process", involving pupils, teachers and parents: "It's not something that's happened or is going to happen - it's continuous."

He added: "If we are recording information that doesn't actually help the learner, then we're wasting our time."

Parents support profiling and the broad aims of Curriculum for Excellence, stressed the Scottish Parent Teacher Council's executive director, Eileen Prior.

"Wider achievement is something that parents have really bought into," she said and the idea of P7 and S3 profiles was viewed positively, although parents wanted more information on what they would look like.

But parents did not fully understand the jargon that was "jam-packed" into Curriculum for Excellence, she said, and terms used in profiling to assess a pupil's progress - "developing", "consolidating" and "secure" - could cause confusion.

She urged teachers to "use practical examples, understandable comparisons to make things come to life".

Parents wanted clear information about what their children could do, concurred Morag Gunion, Glasgow City Council's head of curriculum, learning and teaching: "I don't particularly want to use terms like `developing' and `consolidating'," she added.

Online sample

All schools are working towards producing the first P7 profiles - for all P7 pupils - by June 2012. All schools will develop profiles for all S3 pupils by June 2013.

Education Scotland worked with some schools to create early P7 examples: http:bit.lyuxfLrV.


Register to continue reading for free

It only takes a moment and you'll get access to more news, plus courses, jobs and teaching resources tailored to you

Henry Hepburn

Henry Hepburn

Henry Hepburn is the news editor for Tes Scotland

Find me on Twitter @Henry_Hepburn

Latest stories

Schools need to be ready for any blame pushed onto teachers by unhappy pupils

GCSE results day 2021: How to handle TAG unhappiness

What should a teacher do if a student blames them for not getting the GCSE grade they think they deserve this year? Tes rounds up advice for those preparing for that possibility
Grainne Hallahan 5 Aug 2021
Teacher assessed grades, TAGs, results day 2021

SQA results day 2021: how we got here

It’s been a frenetic year – with exams were cancelled and the SQA due to be replaced – so here’s a recap of events on the road to results day
Emma Seith 5 Aug 2021