RE and science

8th June 2007, 1:00am

Share

RE and science

https://www.tes.com/magazine/archive/re-and-science
The Reverend Jan Ainsworth has a position that is probably second to none in influencing education policy for Church of England schools. Her call for intelligent design to be taught in science lessons (TES, June 1) is misguided and naive.

Creationism and intelligent design have been ruled out of science classes because they simply are not science. As she acknowledges, there is already a place to discuss these issues: the proper place, religious education.

Courses in the history of science may discuss William Paley and his ideas, but this is not the new pseudo-science of intelligent design. Having researched the motives behind intelligent design, it is not, despite claims to the contrary, just another scientific approach to solving the question of origins. It was devised by American evangelical Christians as an assault on the teaching of evolution in schools and a bid to bring six-day creationism into science.

Scientific theories explain the observations of scientists. Intelligent design explains precisely nothing. Affording it the same status as a fully developed, testable scientific theory is wrong.

James Williams. Lecturer in science education, University of Sussex, Brighton

Want to keep reading for free?

Register with Tes and you can read two free articles every month plus you'll have access to our range of award-winning newsletters.

Keep reading for just £1 per month

You've reached your limit of free articles this month. Subscribe for £1 per month for three months and get:

  • Unlimited access to all Tes magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters
Recent
Most read
Most shared