Rule on ties that binds

2nd July 2004, 1:00am

Share

Rule on ties that binds

https://www.tes.com/magazine/archive/rule-ties-binds
Last year an employment tribunal ruled a civil servant had been unfairly dismissed for refusing to wear a collar and tie. This has now been overturned by the Employment Appeal Tribunal and sent back to the original tribunal for reconsideration.

The claimant complained about a dress code which said men must dress in a “professional and businesslike way”, with a collar and tie. Women had to “dress appropriately to a similar standard” but continued to wear T-shirts.

The tribunal said it was discriminatory for men to be required to wear particular clothing while women were not.

But the appeal concluded that this was the wrong approach. The tribunal should have asked whether men and women could only achieve equivalent smartness if men wore a collar and tie.

Further challenges to dress codes look set to be made, following the new regulations outlawing discrimination by sexual orientation and religion.

But schools which still believe in particular dress standards should not be deterred. They can impose a dress code on staff that is different for men and women. The trick is to ensure that the overall effect does not lead to less favourable treatment for one sex.

Want to keep reading for free?

Register with Tes and you can read two free articles every month plus you'll have access to our range of award-winning newsletters.

Keep reading for just £1 per month

You've reached your limit of free articles this month. Subscribe for £1 per month for three months and get:

  • Unlimited access to all Tes magazine content
  • Exclusive subscriber-only stories
  • Award-winning email newsletters
Recent
Most read
Most shared