Scrutiny of the documentation shows, however, that not all is as it seems. To put it bluntly, the form sent out to schools was somewhat slanted. Heads were asked to tick boxes on a standard five-point scale ranging from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree". Fair enough, you might think.
But Woodhead watchers will be astonished to learn that the middle point was "broadly agree". No neutral views allowed. Yet OFSTED itself, in 1996, declared the middle point of a five-point scale to be not neutral, but negative. Thereby justifying HM Chief Inspector's gloomy analysis of primary schools when everyone else, including ex-HMI Colin Richards, thought schools were doing OK.