Study casts doubt onwhole-class methods

WHOLE-class teaching may disadvantage under-achievers, according to a new study of the technique which is central to the literacy and numeracy strategies.

It shows that under-achievers - defined as those performing below their potential - are least likely to play a positive part in lesson.

Under-achieving boys are reluctant to answer teachers' questions as early as the first year of primary school. Under-achieving girls follow suit by Year 4.

The study knocks on the head the notion that boys dominate mixed-sex classes.

It shows that boys do call out more in class but high-achievers of both sexes make the most constructive contributions. From about Year 8, high-achieving girls answer most questions.

By that stage, the researchers led by Debra Myhill of Exeter University, found that even high-achieving boys behaved like their low-achieving classmates. From having been the keenest participants in Year 5, by Year 8 they were the most reluctant volunteers. The researchers suggest that this may be because adolescent boys see it as "not cool" to be hard-working or enthusiastic.

The research, which features in this month's British Educational Research Journal, arose from a commission by a group of schools in the Exeter area which wanted to find out why its boys were underachieving.

The group was a "pyramid" consisting of 12 first, three middle schools and one high school. Researchers focused on four pupil types: high-achieving boys and girls and under-achieving boys and girls, looking at the behaviour of one of each type in 36 classes over 106 teaching sessions.

Log in or register for FREE to continue reading.

It only takes a moment and you'll get access to more news, plus courses, jobs and teaching resources tailored to you