A blatant conflict of Labour policies;Letter

27th February 1998 at 00:00
Nicolas Barnard's fascinating article (TES, February 13) on the Government's plans to increase financial delegation to schools covered most of the leading issues; except for one, and that is fundamental to the Prime Minister's plans.

The Government's social exclusion unit is currently organising a series of rolling meetings. I attended one in Newham.

From the meeting, it became clear that targets set by the Prime Minister for reducing social exclusion are at odds with the Department for Education and Employment's future plans for local management. Local authorities' ability to target their services at those vulnerable to exclusion depends on the existence of those services not being subject to LMS delegation. The co-ordination of all local authority services cannot be vulnerable to the fact that one is subject to the vagaries of "buy-back".

There is not a starker case of policy conflict. I look forward to Stephen Byers, as school standards minister and the DFEE representative on the social exclusion unit, identifying which policy has to give first.


Assistant secretary Education and equal opportunities National Union of Teachers Mabledon Place London WC1

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today