A change of headteacher is not always necessary

6th June 1997 at 01:00
We were interested in reading about "failing schools" (TES, May 23) and in particular that the key factor in recovery is appointing an effective head.

While we believe that effective leadership is essential, in our forthcoming book, No Quick Fixes, we dispute that a new head is always necessary.

In only just over half of cases thus far, the head has changed within a term or two before (25 per cent) or after (75 per cent) the school's failure. In many cases, a headteacher who has been at the school for some years has remained at the helm. Some of these have moved on a year or two later. Others have stayed with the school and led it to substantial improvement - in several cases, actually leading it off special measures.

The judgment of special measures releases extra funds and support from the local education authority. If all the departing heads had been given extra resources and support when they needed it, we wonder if they would have left.



International School Effectiveness and Improvement Centre Institute of Education University of London 20 Bedford Way London WC1

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now