A change of headteacher is not always necessary

6th June 1997 at 01:00
We were interested in reading about "failing schools" (TES, May 23) and in particular that the key factor in recovery is appointing an effective head.

While we believe that effective leadership is essential, in our forthcoming book, No Quick Fixes, we dispute that a new head is always necessary.

In only just over half of cases thus far, the head has changed within a term or two before (25 per cent) or after (75 per cent) the school's failure. In many cases, a headteacher who has been at the school for some years has remained at the helm. Some of these have moved on a year or two later. Others have stayed with the school and led it to substantial improvement - in several cases, actually leading it off special measures.

The judgment of special measures releases extra funds and support from the local education authority. If all the departing heads had been given extra resources and support when they needed it, we wonder if they would have left.



International School Effectiveness and Improvement Centre Institute of Education University of London 20 Bedford Way London WC1

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today