This A-grade exams fiasco highlights many issues

31st August 2012 at 01:00

I seem to remember that when O levels were invented they were not intended for those students who were going on to A levels; they were for those who were leaving school at 16. Then along came CSEs for those who were not deemed capable of doing O levels. But soon, if one achieved a certain grade then it was to be equivalent to an O level.

I could be forgetful, but during the lead up to the introduction of GCSEs, there was a great deal of debate concerning the fact that if a pupil achieved a certain level in their work, that pupil would receive an appropriate grade. This meant that everyone could technically gain an A grade. That sounded fair enough.

Yet this was never allowed to happen because the cohort's results needed to be put into a "bell chart" or curve of normal distribution. Their achievements were manipulated. A grade in one year couldn't be the worth of that grade in another year, because of the socialpolitical manipulation.

Young people and employers are still being misinformed and mislead.

R. Vaughton, France.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today