On a question of bias

24th November 1995 at 00:00
I read with interest Jonathan Lawson's response on behalf of the Office for Standards in Education to the BBC2 documentary Modern Times. Indeed, I am extremely sympathetic to the view that TV producers can present a distorted or biased picture and may very well set out to prove a "pre-determined thesis".

Could this be a case of the "biter bit"? After all, is it not the case that OFSTED's proposed inspection en masse of the London boroughs of Lambeth and Waltham Forest schools are also on the basis of a "pre-determined thesis" - namely that they are failing the children they serve. I was moved by the lead inspector's concern that the programme would "fail to represent the complex nature of inspectors' work", and offer him my sincere condolences. I wonder whether the "complex nature" of the workings of inner-city schools will be reflected in the forthcoming inspections of the "doomed" of Lambeth and Waltham Forest? Somehow I strongly doubt it.


Deputy head

St Chad's school



Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today