A right to take action

7th December 2012 at 00:00

I read with amusement Anna Trethewey's piece entitled "What do we want? No direct action!" (Comment, 30 November). As a teacher with 35 years' service, I rather like the current action. It allows me to focus on my core responsibilities. Pupils' learning is not affected and I can guarantee that my non-contact periods will not be taken and I can use the time to support my teaching. I can manage the tyranny of the internal email. I can also reject excessive observations driven by Ofsted in favour of those agreed within a performance management system. Action short of strike action does not stop me from running extracurricular activities, and I can reject "voluntary" ones imposed by management. The "essential" meetings that Trethewey cites should be on the calendar just as staff meetings are. Proper planning of activities demonstrates good management, recognises our contractual entitlements and shows respect for our interests. The action may not move the government but it puts me in control.

Louis Kavanagh, Teacher, Solihull.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today