Above board

23rd June 1995 at 01:00
About 80 per cent of the letters to the editor on June 16 attacked me for daring to criticise an article promoting the arts for factual inaccuracies.

Many of them seem to have either missed the original article or chosen minor points to comment on, so I would like to state the main points of my objections clearly.

First I oppose any alteration to the national curriculum for the next five years, preferably for the next ten.

Second, I support the Dearing version of the national curriculum. It is a workable compromise by a relatively impartial umpire. Any subject area that seeks to improve its position can only do so at the expense of others.

Third, I don't like lobby groups that try to promote their case with inaccurate statements.

This sort of professional discussion should be open and above board.

JOHN A HANSON Address supplied

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today