Above board

23rd June 1995 at 01:00
About 80 per cent of the letters to the editor on June 16 attacked me for daring to criticise an article promoting the arts for factual inaccuracies.

Many of them seem to have either missed the original article or chosen minor points to comment on, so I would like to state the main points of my objections clearly.

First I oppose any alteration to the national curriculum for the next five years, preferably for the next ten.

Second, I support the Dearing version of the national curriculum. It is a workable compromise by a relatively impartial umpire. Any subject area that seeks to improve its position can only do so at the expense of others.

Third, I don't like lobby groups that try to promote their case with inaccurate statements.

This sort of professional discussion should be open and above board.

JOHN A HANSON Address supplied

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now