Academies: are they just white elephants?

22nd April 2011 at 01:00

In his editorial, Gerard Kelly comprehensively misses the point.

He is right that "there is nothing more democratic than a group of citizens banding together to set up their own schools". Many of the best schools founded over the last 500 years have been developed in this way. But the wholly undemocratic principle at issue is that academies are Government schools. They are annually funded under an agreement with a single individual, a Government minister.

That agreement is terminable at seven years' notice. Oh, but a future government minister who inherits these contracts would never suddenly reduce the level of discretionary funding he hands out to each academy year by year. Really? Tell that to a school that thought it would be rebuilt under the Building Schools for the Future programme. The future well-being of any individual academy depends on the goodwill of a single individual: the secretary of state of the day. That is the principle at stake.

Sir Peter Newsam, Former chief schools adjudicator, Pickering, North Yorkshire.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today