Access to excellence for all, not selection at 14, should be our aim

6th February 2009 at 00:00

I have long held the belief that the educational leaving age should be raised to 18 and the school leaving age lowered to 14. In light of that belief, I judge that Geoff Lucas's argument for selection at 14 is half right. It would make sense if, after three years of orientation, 14-year-olds were able to pursue different kinds of courses of study. But, unlike Geoff Lucas, my emphasis would be on self-selection of courses, to be pursued in a variety of educational settings - both formal and informal, school and non-school.

I wonder, would Lucas's "world-class selective schools in the independent sector" be able, or willing, to cope with the consequences?

Professor Colin Richards, Spark Bridge, Cumbria.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today