AfL needs reassessment

27th July 2012 at 01:00

I was interested to hear Dylan Wiliam's thoughts on the distortions of AfL in classrooms ("Think you've implemented Assessment for Learning?", 20 July). A couple of points emerged from our school-based research.

First, the "confusion" over the definition of "assessment" is partly caused by the absence of its use in conjunction with an understanding of "formative". Second, the travelling salesperson who sells workshops to teachers on AfL has failed to emphasise "learning" as an activity that requires teachers to understand the complexity of that learning process and plan accordingly. The reduction of the pedagogical training aspect of initial teacher training in England to make room for fast-track solutions has validated this minimum-level competency process.

In 2009-10, our team at the Centre for Formative Assessment Studies, University of Manchester, studied AfL strategies across a national sample of primaries. The resultant range of definitions published in the report should have been enough to provoke government attention. It was not newsworthy enough to merit action, sadly.

Bill Boyle, School of Education, University of Manchester.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today