Agenda;Joan Sallis answers your questions;Briefing;Governors

29th January 1999 at 00:00

Should the same governor have been on two exclusion appeals? Two months ago we excluded a girl for 10 days for bullying and her parents made representations, saying she was unjustly accused by a teacher with a grudge.

The three governors on the panel who upheld the head's action included the chairman who thinks he should chair every important meeting, so he was there again when the girl was permanently excluded for repeated bullying incidents, this time with extreme violence and much more evidence. The parents complained that he was biased as his child was said to have been one of the victims. Must we heed this?


Panel members should be governors with no previous involvement, otherwise the outcome can be challenged. In your chair's case he should not have been included if he was involved in the incidents leading up to the exclusion. You must take advice from your local authority but it sounds to me as though you are only safe if you have another hearing with a fresh panel.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today