Angered by archaic views

1st October 2010 at 01:00

I was intrigued to read Tony Fort's letter about special schools and their "main purpose to provide for profound learning disabilities" (Letters, September 24). According to Tony, those young people with what he described as "moderate" needs should be in their local FE college at 16.

Most special schools pride themselves on catering for as wide a range of learning difficulties as they can, and I have to say that it grates to hear a colleague in FE suggesting that we should, for some strange reason, segregate the students on the basis of ability to decide where their future provision should be provided.

I think few people would disagree with Tony's belief that increasing independence should be an aspiration for the student, but his example of the young person who can now walk to the local Tesco and is no longer invisible to society seems based on archaic perceptions of special schools and does little to move practice on.

Sean O'Sullivan, headteacher, Frank Wise School, Banbury, Oxfordshire.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today