Are girls simply brighter?

8th September 2000 at 01:00
IS it not possible that girls get better GCSE results because they are intellectually more mature at 16 than their male peers?

We accept that girls at this age are, on average, physically and emotionally more mature, yet the idea that they might be intellectually more mature, or brighter, is considered abhorrent.

It has been claimed that the exams are now more "girl-friendly" because of coursework and modular testing. Yet the proportion of coursework for most subjects is not more than 25 per cent of the total mark.

In spite of this, results for both boys and girls have improved since the days of 100 per cent cursework exams.

Boys' achievement over the past six years has also improved year on year, so the new exams don't seem to have had a negative effect. Perhaps our male-dominated and androcentric authorities just can't accept the idea that girls are brighter than boys?

What is a central issue when it comes to boys' under-achievement is the well-documented fact that girls work harder and are more motivated. This is the area that we need to be concerned about with our male students.

Paul Hopkins

School of education

Open University

72B Conniburrow Bld

Milton Keynes


Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today