Art critics ignored

1st December 2000 at 00:00
I RECENTLY attended an art and design area meeting where a representative of the Scottish Qualifications Authority claimed that marking had been "satisfactory". This remark received a very strong negative from about 50 heads of departments who described their results as very unpredictable. Students regarded as As got a C, while othes predicted a D grade also got a C.

There is something very seriously wrong with Higher Still art and design and there seems to be no intention on the part of SQA or of the Higher Still Development Unit to listen to the concerns of art teachers.

Bill Robb

Head of Art

George Watson's College, Edinburgh

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today