Art critics ignored

1st December 2000 at 00:00
I RECENTLY attended an art and design area meeting where a representative of the Scottish Qualifications Authority claimed that marking had been "satisfactory". This remark received a very strong negative from about 50 heads of departments who described their results as very unpredictable. Students regarded as As got a C, while othes predicted a D grade also got a C.

There is something very seriously wrong with Higher Still art and design and there seems to be no intention on the part of SQA or of the Higher Still Development Unit to listen to the concerns of art teachers.

Bill Robb

Head of Art

George Watson's College, Edinburgh

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now