Avoidance advice is untimely

7th March 2003 at 00:00
Lynda Brine's article on sex education does indeed perform "a valuable service", as you say in your leader.

I am a Year 10 tutor and I share her concerns. She highlights the bizarre situation where at a crucial stage a school's input about the most profound experience a human being can have is reduced to the message: avoid disease, avoid babies.

Your editorial goes on to add that teachers cannot assume that "their own morality rules". This implies that there is, somehow, a neutral position.

This is simply not the case.

Either one teaches about sexual relations in the context of the importance of trust and responsibility, or one doesn't. If one doesn't, the absence of such a context implies that these values are not important.

Richard Hudson

Dalling Road

London SW6

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a TES/ TESS subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
 
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today