Bac backs history but makes a martyr of RE

21st January 2011 at 00:00

Colleagues across the country are disgruntled to find schools are to be judged retrospectively against a performance measure which did not exist at the time students took their exams.

The even more disturbing issue is the number of schools already undertaking curriculum reviews and considering major shifts away from vocational courses which have proved so beneficial for so many.

The Coalition has said five A*-Cs at GCSE, including English and maths, will remain the most important indicator and schools should be free to do what is best for their learners.

Michael Gove obviously intended the new performance indicator to apply a degree of leverage to schools but a knee-jerk response is likely to deliver what he wants, rather than what is best for pupils. Now is the time for a considered debate on the curriculum.

David Peck, Curriculum Foundation, Harrogate.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now