Basic values

30th December 1994 at 00:00
No amount of manipulation of the GCSE results for value-added purposes (TES, December 9) should obscure some basic principles. First, value added, as understood in this context, is a means of making league tables more acceptable, even though the GCSE is meant to measure pupils' achievements rather than put them into a rank order.

Second, the implicit definition of "value" - ie, performance in the GCSE exams - is so narrow that it is seriously misleading. No matter how important high grades (which are not necessarily the same as good exam results) are, we should not allow them to represent the value that a good school contributes to a pupil's all-round education.

Even within the narrow reference of performance in exams, no one has yet devised a reliable means of calculating for a pupil the relative importance of the schoolteacher factor and the pupil abilityhome support factor. Until someone does, all the various computations, indexation figures and so on, will be based on invalid premises.


2 Mayville Drive, Manchester

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today