Basic values

30th December 1994 at 00:00
No amount of manipulation of the GCSE results for value-added purposes (TES, December 9) should obscure some basic principles. First, value added, as understood in this context, is a means of making league tables more acceptable, even though the GCSE is meant to measure pupils' achievements rather than put them into a rank order.

Second, the implicit definition of "value" - ie, performance in the GCSE exams - is so narrow that it is seriously misleading. No matter how important high grades (which are not necessarily the same as good exam results) are, we should not allow them to represent the value that a good school contributes to a pupil's all-round education.

Even within the narrow reference of performance in exams, no one has yet devised a reliable means of calculating for a pupil the relative importance of the schoolteacher factor and the pupil abilityhome support factor. Until someone does, all the various computations, indexation figures and so on, will be based on invalid premises.

T McSWEENEY

2 Mayville Drive, Manchester

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now