For better or for worse

21st April 2006 at 01:00
Elizabeth Buie reports on the impact a faculty system had on one secondary

Exam results showed an overall improvement in one secondary school after it moved to a faculty structure - but 24 per cent of the results deteriorated.

This is revealed in a report into secondary restructuring carried out by the Teachers' Agreement Communications (TAC) team. It recommends that a monitoring system should be established to track subject performance in faculties on a regular basis.

The latest review of the faculty system, brought in by many secondary schools after the teachers' agreement flattened the promotion structure, evaluated Standard grade Credit and Higher results in science and social studies at one unnamed secondary. Overall, 76 per cent of results showed improvement or no change and 24 per cent a deterioration.

The report states: "While this seems to be a satisfactory position, it is necessary to examine whether there is cause for concern over the 24 per cent of results showing a decline. Subject results vary year-on-year and so an ongoing fluctuation is expected."

In 2001-05, average fluctuations in pass rates (comparing each year with the previous year) were:

* Science subjects: improved - 49 per cent; no change - 5 per cent; declined - 46 per cent.

* Social subjects - improved - 55 per cent; no change - 4 per cent; declined - 45 per cent.

The TAC report states: "The 24 per cent deterioration figure does not seem to be a cause for concern, being well below the average year-on-year deterioration of 45 per cent or 46 per cent in pass rates."

The team also questions whether there is any relationship between a faculty principal teacher's subject specialism and subject results. "For example,"

the report asks, "does the PT's own subject perform better than the other subjects?"

Its report concludes: "The limited amount of data available suggests that this issue should continue to be monitored, but that there are no grounds for concern at present.

"In the sciences, improvement or no change was evident in 86 per cent of results in the PT's own subject but only 65 per cent in the other faculty subjects. In social subjects, results improved or showed no change in 90 per cent of cases for the PT's own subject, but only 81 per cent of other faculty subjects."

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today