For better or worse, modern grammars have moved on

4th December 2009 at 00:00

When my daughter took her O-levels in 1987, she did well enough in all but French for teachers to say she was Oxbridge material. She re-took French O-level in the autumn and again failed. That was the last O-level, so the following summer she took French at GCSE - and got an A.

At the time, I doubted the usefulness of the GCSE. I remember her saying, "Dad, it's so easy! You don't have to worry about grammar or declensions or gender - all you have to do is be able to read street signs and find your way about and learn a simple vocabulary."

I have since realised this is a much more sensible approach. While I struggle to think up a grammatically correct sentence in French, my less academically educated - and so less inhibited - compatriots get on like a house on fire with native French speakers, using fractured syntax and "Franglais" that is cheerfully accepted by all.

By the time I get my beautiful schoolboy French sentence out, the conversation has moved on.

John Harrison, Co-author of 'Wot, No School?', Rye, East Sussex.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today