Beware rushing in a funding model that is too simplistic

29th May 2009 at 01:00

It is not clear how punishing colleges financially will force them to improve. A more likely scenario is that those with less money will slip further into decline.

How will withholding funds translate into better classroom performance by tutors and students? Isn't it more likely that good tutors will move on and those who stay will be demoralised? This may be excusable if the aim is to close down poorly performing colleges, but how many students will suffer?

This is another example of inappropriate market-led business models being applied to education. The Learning and Skills Council has tried to manipulate the curriculum and raise standards by a complex funding regime that has raised administrative overheads to a ridiculous level. It has put pressure on colleges to increase retention and achievement, but as this is driven by financial incentives, education has become contorted to fit the needs of the LSC and institutions, not those of students and local community.

The LSC should consider what really motivates people and produces successful education: an intrinsic drive to teach, not a response to financial formula.

John Linfoot, Bournemouth.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today