Beware Wikipedia, warns watchdog

15th January 2010 at 00:00
Pupils relying on the online encyclopedia as a research tool risk using information that is 'completely untrue', says Ofqual

Exams watchdog Ofqual has issued a warning to all pupils in England against relying on Wikipedia as a research tool for their coursework.

In guidance sent out last week, the regulator said information from online resource sites such as the popular free online encyclopedia may not "be authoritative and accurate" and, in some, cases "completely untrue".

The comments were made in publications issued to teachers, parents and carers, as well as pupils, giving advice about authenticating learners' work and correctly referencing sources.

The report does emphasise, however, that search engines such as Google and Yahoo can be excellent sources for information because they pool material from numerous sources, based on learners' "keyword" searches.

Alf Wilkinson, national history head for new secondary curriculum at The Historical Association, said: "Ofqual rightly identifies Wiki-pedia's quality as variable and dependent on the knowledge and understanding of the contributor of each article. Part of the beauty of the internet is anyone can post anything, and it is likely to contain contrasting statements, ideas and interpretations.

'Bad' websites can be as useful as 'good' websites, as long as we give pupils the skills to weigh up arguments, make sure they are supported by evidence and reach their own conclusion.

"Wikipedia is no better, or worse, than Google. Pupils need to develop critical faculties when using the web. They readily question evidence in a textbook, but often accept what is online at face value.

"It is an issue, and Ofqual is right to point out that Wikipedia on its own is not enough. But neither is any single source. Most history teachers are aware of this issue and try to encourage critical use of web sources."

One guide, Using Sources: A Guide for Students, concedes that Wikipedia is useful for pupils researching assignments, but warns they should "never use it as your only source."

Mike Peel, chair of independent wiki support group Wikimedia UK, agreed with the watchdog. "The report contains fantastic advice on how to use Wikipedia as a starting point for research," he said.

"What you should never do is use content directly. It should be a stepping stone for going to other websites. I was taught at school, as a rule, to never reference an encyclopedia as a source, be it Britannica or Wikipedia. Every (Wikipedia) article should have references, with links to other sources."

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today