Blunkett accused over assisted places;News in brief

16th July 1999 at 01:00
THE HIGH Court has attacked David Blunkett for misleading parents about the phasing out of the Assisted Places Scheme.

Mr Justice Maurice Kay said the Education Secretary had done himself no credit when he incorrectly promised that children who already had a place in an all-through school would be allowed to continue. It was a "sorry state of affairs".

His comments came during an unsuccessful court challenge by a mother who found her daughter's assisted (state-funded) place had been axed when she applied to join the senior section of the school. Labour had promised in its pre-election manifesto to abolish the assisted places but to protect those children with them.

Rachel Begbie had asked the court to hold Mr Blunkett to his pre-election promises and fund her daughter's schooling. The test case is thought to affect up to 1,500 pupils currently in junior departments of private schools providing education up to the age of 18.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today