Boys buck the trend and come out on top

22nd November 1996 at 00:00
GENDER. A comparative study of pupil performance in more than 40 countries has confirmed that English children really are poor at maths - but its science findings are surprisingly upbeat. David Budge reports. English boys may have fallen behind girls at GCSE and A-level, but they have salvaged some self-respect by outscoring their female classmates in the TIMSS tests.

The gender division was particularly noticeable in chemistry, where Year 8 boys' average score was 51 per cent, compared with the girls' 44 per cent. But as the able below right shows, Years 8 and 9 boys also pipped the girls in the other categories of the science test - physics, science in the environment, life science and earth science.

And the fact that the gender differences were not statistically significant, with the exception of Year 8 chemistry, is unlikely to spoil their sense of triumph. The Year 9 boys' average overall science mark was 562, compared with 542 for girls.

The gender divide was equally wide in Scotland (527:507), where the boys were significantly stronger in earth science and chemistry, but not in physics. Boys outscored girls in about three-quarters of the countries that took part in TIMSS, but in the top-ranking country, Singapore, the gender divide was minimal.

The difference in boys' and girls' maths scores was less pronounced, not only in England, but in the other countries surveyed. The average overall score for Year 9 English boys was only three ahead of the girls' (465:462). But the Year 8 English boys had a 17-point lead over the girls (484:467).

The authors of this week's report on England's performance in the tests acknowledge that the TIMSS scores differ from the results of the national curriculum key stage 3 assessments and suggest that this may be because of the type of questions used.

"There's evidence that the performance of girls is lower than that of boys on multiple-choice items," they say. "In TIMSS, about 80 per cent of questions were presented using a multiple-choice format, so this may have been a contributory factor to gender difference."

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today