Brightest 'hindered by maths A-level'

14th February 1997 at 00:00
The brightest mathematics candidates at A-level are facing little more than a speed test because the questions have become so straightforward, according to a confidential analysis by the School Curriculum and Assessment Authority.

SCAA says that the A-level exam is under increasing strain as it struggles to tackle a huge increase in candidates and a wide ability range. Exam setters have responded by making maths questions easier.

This week, Education and Employment Secretary Gillian Shephard launched a series of measures aimed at restoring the exam's "gold standard" reputation.

At the same time, she came under fire from Colin Goldsmith, one of the maths experts behind the influential Standards over Time report, a joint study of A-level standards during the past 20 years by SCAA and the Office for Standards in Education. He denounced the "gold standard" as a dangerous illusion.

"No politician of any party has been brave enough to explain to the public that lowering standards is often appropriate and highly desirable, leading in some respects to higher standards," writes Mr Goldsmith, the maths co-ordinator for Standards over Time, in this week's TES.

It is "unhelpful and irrelevant" to use crude statements like "standards have fallen," he writes. The reality is that passmarks have risen and failure rates reduced. In 1975, 40 per cent of students failed despite having some ability.

While weaker candidates are well served at present, he says, the brightest are suffering - often tested for little more than speed. He calls for tiered papers to cope with the wide ability range.

SCAA's analysis of 1996 maths exams has been sent to all the A-level boards, several of which dispute its findings. The document says that "the increasing demand in terms of workload on candidates in 1996 to complete the papers in the time available often appeared to be a greater challenge to the grade-A candidate than the inherent difficulty of the questions."

The analysis also concludes that last summer's questions were significantly easier than in 1995.

Setting papers suitable for all candidates is, concedes SCAA, "a very significant challenge indeed".

Mrs Shephard's response to this sort of concern has been to tighten up A-level standards. This week's proposals included reducing the number of exam boards and syllabuses to ensure comparability.

But according to Mr Goldsmith, a chief examiner in maths with the Oxford and Cambridge Schools Examination Board, any attempt to return to the standards of the past amounts to "political cowardice" - for ignoring the evidence that the current maths A-level is doing a good job. "The marks scored will drop, " he writes, "confidence will be eroded and numbers will plummet again."

Curriculum, TES2, page 21

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today