British hate the idea of a republic

20th June 2003 at 01:00
It is a pity that your report "Coronation: was it just for the mugs?" (TES, June 6) lacked balance.

Our system of constitutional monarchy has been tried and tested and found to work well. Is the syllabus in citizenship a cynical ploy by republicans to push their agenda on pupils? If so, we should refuse to teach it.

Citizenship should explore how our system of constitutional monarchy developed, its strengths, the stability it gives and the safeguards provided by the separation of powers. The only justification for changing what we have is if we can replace it with something better. We experimented with a republic under Cromwell and hated it.

I have not the slightest qualm in celebrating the great state occasions and anniversaries. That all this should centre on a person gives it heart. A republic focuses on a clinical code with which we cannot identify. Her Majesty represents high ideals, especially those of duty and service. By contrast, politicians, as we all know, crave power and make use of the electorate to grasp it.

Neil D Bryson

5 Chatworth Close Maidenhead, Berkshire

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today