Bullying claims upheld

23rd March 2001 at 00:00
AN investigators' report has upheld allegations of bullying and harassment against former Basildon College principal Chris Chapman.

The confidential 30-page document, received by The TES, was prepared by a team from the Further Education Funding Council for its chief executive David Melville. Mr Chapman was suspended by governors last March after complaints from more than 50 staff. His resignation was announced on February 12.

The investigation, involving 38 interviews, was carried out after allegations from whistleblowers.

The report said investigators "substantiated" a number of allegations about the principal's management style. These include claims that:

* "The principal's reign was characterised by bullying and intimidation and a mismanagement of initiatives and procedures;"

* "Staff were subject to disciplinary procedures for allegedly failing to submit tutorial records for audit purposes and failing to follow instructions from a senior manager;"

* "A number of staff are without contracts or correct pay after considerable time in post."

Investigators said the college had failed to comply with its own anti-bullying policy, which involved complaints being invetigated by a "trained and competent person".

"Neither management nor staff have been provided with the requisite training," the report said, although these issues were being addressed by the college since Mr Chapman's departure.

The investigators also found that a member of staff was asked to exaggerate the number of students attending induction sessions, and that the number of telephone helplines at the college had also been exaggerated.

The report said: "Nine lines open for 45 hours per week over a year, divided by 5,000 students, would mean a theoretical availability of four hours per student. In fact, the college only had two lines for this purpose."

Responding to allegations of poor management and staff support, the report upheld a complaint over redundancy notices being wrongly issued to some staff in engineering, as a result of an timetabling error. Staff were left feeling unsupported and vulnerable, the report said.

A number of complaints were not substantiated. These included claims that inaccurate achievement figures were provided to the FEFC, that timetables were badly-organised and that governors refused to discuss problems with union representatives.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today