Call for probe to enhance 'curriculum coherence'

19th November 2010 at 00:00

The national curriculum should be subject to a "sophisticated analysis" that compares to other systems around the world in a bid to increase its "coherence", according to a working paper from Cambridge Assessment.

Tim Oates, director of research at the exam body, argues that there are significant structural problems with the current national curriculum and that the 2007 review, which gave secondaries more leeway for cross-curricular work, was a "step backwards".

His paper says that while there is a danger of 'policy borrowing' from other countries, a sophisticated analysis would help determine when certain knowledge and skills can be taught.

Mr Oates also argues that trans-national analysis has shown the importance of 'curriculum coherence', saying: "Curriculum coherence is vital and is associated with high-performing systems.

"This is not just a trivial, common-language use of the word 'coherence'. A system is regarded as 'coherent' when the national curriculum content, textbooks, teaching content, pedagogy assessment and drivers are all aligned and reinforce one another."

To achieve coherence, there does need to be a degree of control - but this does not need to be 'top-down' control.

In Singapore, for example, the national curriculum seems less prescriptive than in England, but a way of controlling curriculum in Singapore is through approved textbooks and teaching materials.

Similarly, in Finland schools have a high degree of autonomy, but Mr Oates points out that teachers are trained to masters level.

He said a change to content was necessary, but not sufficient, to improve the education system, and added that any change to content should avoid the 'lapse into a drive towards consensus' that previous revisions have adopted.

He concludes: 'A well-defined and enhanced national curriculum - based on concepts, principles, fundamental operations and key knowledge - can lead to learning processes which are more focused on deep learning (fewer topics pursued to greater depth) and to assessment processes of greater validity and which have a beneficial wash back into learning."

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today