Call for probe to enhance 'curriculum coherence'

19th November 2010 at 00:00

The national curriculum should be subject to a "sophisticated analysis" that compares to other systems around the world in a bid to increase its "coherence", according to a working paper from Cambridge Assessment.

Tim Oates, director of research at the exam body, argues that there are significant structural problems with the current national curriculum and that the 2007 review, which gave secondaries more leeway for cross-curricular work, was a "step backwards".

His paper says that while there is a danger of 'policy borrowing' from other countries, a sophisticated analysis would help determine when certain knowledge and skills can be taught.

Mr Oates also argues that trans-national analysis has shown the importance of 'curriculum coherence', saying: "Curriculum coherence is vital and is associated with high-performing systems.

"This is not just a trivial, common-language use of the word 'coherence'. A system is regarded as 'coherent' when the national curriculum content, textbooks, teaching content, pedagogy assessment and drivers are all aligned and reinforce one another."

To achieve coherence, there does need to be a degree of control - but this does not need to be 'top-down' control.

In Singapore, for example, the national curriculum seems less prescriptive than in England, but a way of controlling curriculum in Singapore is through approved textbooks and teaching materials.

Similarly, in Finland schools have a high degree of autonomy, but Mr Oates points out that teachers are trained to masters level.

He said a change to content was necessary, but not sufficient, to improve the education system, and added that any change to content should avoid the 'lapse into a drive towards consensus' that previous revisions have adopted.

He concludes: 'A well-defined and enhanced national curriculum - based on concepts, principles, fundamental operations and key knowledge - can lead to learning processes which are more focused on deep learning (fewer topics pursued to greater depth) and to assessment processes of greater validity and which have a beneficial wash back into learning."

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now