Camden way is the road to success

14th April 2000 at 01:00
THE LONDON borough of Camden, one of the most deprived areas in England, this week won praise from Chris Woodhead, the chief inspector of schools.

He lauded it as a very good local education authority, saying its achievement sent out a clear message to people determined to make excuses for ineffectual performance.

"If Camden can do well, so can other LEAs in a similar position," Mr Woodhead said.

Inspectors judged the authority, with its stark contrasts between affluence and poverty, as very well run, with many more strengths, 15 in total, than weaknesses.

Leadership was very good, planning was of a high order and while standards in schools have generally been below the national average they were higher than those for other inner-London boroughs. At Key Stage 2 they have risen markedly and sometimes exceeded national averages.

Some of the primary schools were said to have made outstanding progress. The report said: "Camden is not only a good LEA, but an improving one. There is a common sense of purpose to drive up standards and achieve excellence."

Its successes will be held up as an example to those who seek to use poverty as an excuse for failure. The proportion of pupils in Camden's 59 schools eligible for free school meals is well above the national average, as is that for children with special educational needs in mainstream classes.

Around a fifth of the borough's residents, and a third of its under-16s, come from ethnic-minority groups. Its 23,000 pupils speak 106 different languages and for around 40 per cent of them English is anadditional language.

Refugee children represent 11 per cent of primary and 7 per cent of secondary pupils and numbers are increasing.

Yet the quality of its primary schools, in overall terms, is above that of other similar London councils - Hammersmith and Fulham, Westminster, Haringey, Wandsworth and Kensington and Chelsea - and above the national average.

The authority is, however, criticised for not being open enough about the cost of its services. Recommendations include improving the support given to schools to raise attendance.

Bob Litchfield, Camden's education director, said: "This is proof that Camden's children are getting a first-class education. It is a just tribute to the hard work of everyone involved."

PLAUDITS AND CRITICISMS

STRENGTHS

planning

support for school management

early years

personnel services

work on literacy, numeracy, ICT

consultation with schools

ethnic-minority achievement

WEAKNESSES

support to improve attendance

transition arrangements,

particularly key stage 2 to 3

special needs assessment and

statmenting

delegation of money to

schools.

PLAUDITS AND CRITICISMS

STRENGTHS

support for Travellers' children

early years

primary literacy and numeracy

work with failing schools

backing for governors

partnerships with schools

WEAKNESSES

arrangements for pupils temporarily without a school place

special needs statements

attendance

information and communications technology.


Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now