Charity begins at school?

29th April 2005 at 01:00
It is not the fault of independent schools that their charitable status is to be challenged. But they have to accept that, while they might propose, Parliament disposes. So MSPs have subjected them to the test of "public benefit" - and they have to do much better in their defence than they have so far. The last-minute amendment to the charities Bill by the parliamentary communities committee last week to include "unduly restrictive" practices as part of the public benefit test seems reasonable.

After all, a charity can hardly be said to be such if it is charging its beneficiaries rather than being charitable towards them. We do not envy the Solomonic judgments which the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator will now have to exercise.

The defence of the private schools so far, as illustrated in last week's TES Scotland, is unlikely to impress the regulator. The schools send their pupils to entertain old folks, they open their facilities to the public, they put on performances in public spaces. Local authority schools do all of these. Should they be entitled to tax breaks?

The other line of defence is that public benefits from private schools are self-evident because they are in the (non profit-making, they say) business of educating children. Again, so are education authorities and so are parents who educate their children at home. Another case for levelling the playing fields of Eton?

Saving the public purse from having to educate the children of parents who opt for private education and who also pay taxes is another argument. But all citizens pay taxes, whether they benefit from the investment or not.

They include households without children, parents whose children have moved out of the school system and pensioners - not to mention a host of others who make their contribution to the public purse, in the form of social work for example, but do not make a call on it.

Independent schools have had a good run benefiting from an anachronistic inheritance. The parents whose offspring attend them will simply have to accept the inevitable: they are regarded as privileged and, if they are asked to part with a few extra hundred on top of pound;7,000 a term to plug the gap left by the loss of their school's tax perks, few others will shed a tear.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today