Children detest being put in sets

24th November 2000 at 00:00
SETTING is assumed to be the mainstream means of ensuring appropriate level teaching in secondary maths. If schools set nowhere else, they set in maths.

Yet Britain is exceptional in this, argues Professor Dylan Wiliam of King's College London: in fact all of the countries which score higher in international comparisons than us teach secondary children in mixed-ability groups.

In a new study involving questionnaires to more than 2,000 secondary children and teaching observations in six schools, Wiliam and fellow academics Jo Boaler and Margaret Brown, believe they may have discovered why setting and poor performance go hand-in-hand.

Setting is deeply unpopular with the children in the study, all of whom moved from mixed-ability groups in Year 7 to being set by ability in Years 8 or 9. Forty of 48 students interviewed by the researchers from setted classes wanted either to go back to mixed-ability groups or to change sets.

Interestingly, top and bottom sets were almost equally disillusioned: in one school every one of the eight girls interviewed from set one wanted to move down; so did six out of eight boys.

The reason for their unhappiness, argues Professor Wiliam, is that the same teachers who were perfectly capable of gearing their teaching to suit children at different stages inmaths when they were teaching Year 7 mixed-ability classes, completely changed the way they taught once they were faced with ability sets.

They treated the top set as mini-mathematicians, racing through the syllabus and telling any child who said they did not understand that they should understand because they were in the top set.

At the same time, children in the bottom set found teachers hugely reduced their demands, often only requiring them to copy down examples from the board and not do any working out at all.

Going over to setting does not mean teaching methods need change at all, says Wiliam, particularly as there is no reason why a "top" set should be very able - since it only comprises the 30 best mathematicians in a year of that particular school.

But, in practice, teachers assume they can change to a much less demanding teaching style, even though the effect on children is utter disillusionment:

"There is no doubt in my mind that the atmosphere in top-set classrooms, the lack of time to really think through and understand what you are doing, means that half the students who would potentially be the best mathematicians give it up."

"Students' Experience of Ability Grouping" will be published in the December issue of the British Educational Research Journal

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today