Children need tools not rules

4th February 2005 at 00:00
The headline "Leave grammar out of English lessons" did a disservice to the research it reported by forcing the findings into the old polarisation between "grammar good" and "grammar bad" (TES, January 21). Neither position is helpful in understanding what we should teach to give children greater control over language. The term "formal grammar" conjures up all that was bad about grammar teaching 50 years ago. The explicit teaching of grammar focuses on linguistic form, but that doesn't have to be formal. It should be interactive, engaging and related to the making of meaning and the understanding of effect.

Grammar offers insights into expression and the power to shape thought, enabling pupils to say things more precisely and explicitly. It helps them to bend and shape language to say the very thing they mean. The task for the teaching profession is to find how best to teach grammar as a set of tools rather than an inert set of rules.

Sue Hackman National director Key Stage 3 National Strategy Centre for School Students 60 Queens Road, Reading

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today