Chuck out the moisturiser?

14th January 2005 at 00:00
So what is better for the skin? An afternoon with Year 9 or a dollop of Pounds 100-per-pot Creme de la mer? The Teacher Training Agency's new recruitment ad says educating teenagers beats any anti-wrinkle cream. To accuse the teachers who have complained to the Advertising Standards Authority of a sense of humour failure is to miss the point. A study could be more fun than Germaine Greer's exit from Channel 4's Celebrity Big Brother.

Since science teachers are being urged to defend controversial technologies, why not rope them in to research cream vs kids, perhaps using some of the recruits featured in TES First Appointments?

But the research could have more get-out clauses than a double-glazing salesman. Do you use engaging moppets for the disputed ad campaign, or real kids? And do you assume that anti-wrinkle creams actually work?

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today