Chuck out the moisturiser?

14th January 2005 at 00:00
So what is better for the skin? An afternoon with Year 9 or a dollop of Pounds 100-per-pot Creme de la mer? The Teacher Training Agency's new recruitment ad says educating teenagers beats any anti-wrinkle cream. To accuse the teachers who have complained to the Advertising Standards Authority of a sense of humour failure is to miss the point. A study could be more fun than Germaine Greer's exit from Channel 4's Celebrity Big Brother.

Since science teachers are being urged to defend controversial technologies, why not rope them in to research cream vs kids, perhaps using some of the recruits featured in TES First Appointments?

But the research could have more get-out clauses than a double-glazing salesman. Do you use engaging moppets for the disputed ad campaign, or real kids? And do you assume that anti-wrinkle creams actually work?

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now