Code offers a limited solution

4th November 1994 at 00:00
While Alison Kelly (TES, October 25) welcomes the new Code of Practice on the identification and assessment of special education needs, I do not.

The code favours an individual education plan (IEP) in furthering the education of children with special needs, involving targets to be achieved in a given time, thus embracing a product ideology. IEPs have long dominated special education in the USA.

For almost 20 years I have argued that the use of the behavioural objectives model and its associated IEPs give not only a most limited and limiting view of education but might be counter-productive to teaching and learning.

As some enlightened American educators tell us, educational progress is transformative, not additive and incremental and thus incompatible with a pre-specified, step-by-step approach inherent in IEPs.

ALAN GODDARD

Former head

32 Clareville Road

Darlington

Co Durham

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now