Code offers a limited solution

4th November 1994 at 00:00
While Alison Kelly (TES, October 25) welcomes the new Code of Practice on the identification and assessment of special education needs, I do not.

The code favours an individual education plan (IEP) in furthering the education of children with special needs, involving targets to be achieved in a given time, thus embracing a product ideology. IEPs have long dominated special education in the USA.

For almost 20 years I have argued that the use of the behavioural objectives model and its associated IEPs give not only a most limited and limiting view of education but might be counter-productive to teaching and learning.

As some enlightened American educators tell us, educational progress is transformative, not additive and incremental and thus incompatible with a pre-specified, step-by-step approach inherent in IEPs.


Former head

32 Clareville Road


Co Durham

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today