Comprehensive bashing is bad grammar

11th May 2012 at 01:00

Two issues leap out of your article "Time to get tough on grammars, says report" (4 May). Who could possibly argue with David Jesson's assertion that "we need a new way of measuring the performance of these schools and making sure that every pupil reaches their full potential"?

One would hope that Nick Seaton doesn't speak on behalf of the National Grammar Schools Association (NGSA) when he suggests that grammars should be judged by the same five A*-C threshold measure as non-selective schools. One would also hope that the NGSA would wish to dissociate itself from Mr Seaton's comment that "it's the comprehensives and academies whose results are atrocious".

The bigger issue relates to our reliance on the five A*-C threshold as the main national measure of performance. The primacy of this measure has damaged the experience of a generation of learners and there is little evidence that this is set to change.

David Peck, Director, the Curriculum Foundation.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now