Comprehensive bashing is bad grammar

11th May 2012 at 01:00

Two issues leap out of your article "Time to get tough on grammars, says report" (4 May). Who could possibly argue with David Jesson's assertion that "we need a new way of measuring the performance of these schools and making sure that every pupil reaches their full potential"?

One would hope that Nick Seaton doesn't speak on behalf of the National Grammar Schools Association (NGSA) when he suggests that grammars should be judged by the same five A*-C threshold measure as non-selective schools. One would also hope that the NGSA would wish to dissociate itself from Mr Seaton's comment that "it's the comprehensives and academies whose results are atrocious".

The bigger issue relates to our reliance on the five A*-C threshold as the main national measure of performance. The primacy of this measure has damaged the experience of a generation of learners and there is little evidence that this is set to change.

David Peck, Director, the Curriculum Foundation.

Subscribe

To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers
Already have a TES Digital Subscription
Add subscription number

Comments

Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
 
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar, Buyagift.com, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today