Conflicts of AS reforms

12th April 1996 at 01:00
In your leader on Sir Ron Dearing's review (TES, March 29) it was a surprise that you omitted any reference to the conflicts inherent in the proposal to reformulate the Advanced Supplementary (AS) examination into the first half of an A-level.

While Sir Ron appears to have recognised your point that A-levels can never be more than a fraction of the answer, he seems, at the same time, to be extending opportunities for A-level study through the suggestion that the first half of A-level syllabuses should be at the level expected after one year's study, leaving just the second half at the full standard.

This approach contrasts with the need declared elsewhere in the report to maintain A-level standards and is further compounded by asking the universities to afford the reformulated AS half the number of Universities and Colleges Admissions Service points available for a full A-level. The fact that half the points will reflect achievement at a lower level will not be lost on them.

CLIVE R HART Assistant chief executive, School Examinations and Assessment Council, 1988-93 Cherry Tree Close Hughenden Valley High Wycombe Bucks.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today