Controlled assessment should be redrafted

18th May 2012 at 01:00

Amy Winston's criticism of controlled assessment in GCSE English specifications could go much further ("Once is never enough", 11 May): in the name of equality, the able and ambitious have been penalised most unfairly.

Planning, drafting and editing are rigorous skills not to be scoffed at - they are, after all, the basis of most higher level degrees. But students starting A-level English literature in September will often never have had such experiences.

It is no wonder that many independent schools have switched to IGCSEs, which offer conventional coursework options. But this path is closed to the maintained sector: IGCSEs do not count towards performance table points. In the meantime, pupils must suffer an impoverished version of the subject.

Andrew Millar, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire.

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now