Controlled assessment should be redrafted

18th May 2012 at 01:00

Amy Winston's criticism of controlled assessment in GCSE English specifications could go much further ("Once is never enough", 11 May): in the name of equality, the able and ambitious have been penalised most unfairly.

Planning, drafting and editing are rigorous skills not to be scoffed at - they are, after all, the basis of most higher level degrees. But students starting A-level English literature in September will often never have had such experiences.

It is no wonder that many independent schools have switched to IGCSEs, which offer conventional coursework options. But this path is closed to the maintained sector: IGCSEs do not count towards performance table points. In the meantime, pupils must suffer an impoverished version of the subject.

Andrew Millar, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today