Costly recovery

17th November 2006 at 00:00
Giving struggling readers intensive support such as Reading Recovery for roughly two school terms around age six does make a big difference ("Intensive care rescues pupils from illiteracy", TES, November 10). The Clackmannanshire study, cited as evidence for the effectiveness of phonics, made extensive use of such help too.

The reason relatively few children in need of such assistance have been receiving it is, as your article pointed out, because it is expensive. But quite a few people are now beginning to appreciate that without such help the public purse incurs huge costs from illiterate school leavers later on.

What is still not widely understood is that we would have far fewer children with reading problems, and less need for expensive individual literacy coaching of any kind, if English spelling was made a little more learner-friendly.

Masha Bell



Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today