Costly recovery

17th November 2006 at 00:00
Giving struggling readers intensive support such as Reading Recovery for roughly two school terms around age six does make a big difference ("Intensive care rescues pupils from illiteracy", TES, November 10). The Clackmannanshire study, cited as evidence for the effectiveness of phonics, made extensive use of such help too.

The reason relatively few children in need of such assistance have been receiving it is, as your article pointed out, because it is expensive. But quite a few people are now beginning to appreciate that without such help the public purse incurs huge costs from illiterate school leavers later on.

What is still not widely understood is that we would have far fewer children with reading problems, and less need for expensive individual literacy coaching of any kind, if English spelling was made a little more learner-friendly.

Masha Bell



Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number


The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now