Curricular drawbridges

11th November 2005 at 00:00
Question: what do history, maths, science and modern languages have in common? Answer: they are essential ingredients in any "curriculum for excellence", if not for the future of mankind itself. The public prints (even our letters page) have echoed this week to the sounds of special pleading, and we expect that from lobbyists whose life's work has been devoted to teaching their specialised subjects.

The death sentence which Peter Peacock, the Education Minister, has allegedly pronounced on the teaching of history, was based on our report last week from The TES Scotland conversation in Inverness, during which he said "absolutely not" when asked if history was about to fade away. So the minister's firm conviction that history has a future is now being reported as his view that it has not. Strange.

One of the strong messages from our series of conversations so far is that many in the profession believe that the proposals in A Curriculum for Excellence are indeed that, excellent - perhaps a more prevalent view in the primary than the secondary sector. But there is little point in having a curricular review if drawbridges are going to be pulled up all over the place. We might as well pack up and go home.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today