Curriculum: what I was really saying

10th April 2009 at 01:00

My essay "Education and a Meaningful Life" was compressed in your report "Sky's the limit for lives full of meaning" (March 27), leaving me looking a bit of a nutter - and a rabidly anti-religious one too.

I am reported as saying that the traditional subject-based curriculum "rests on the assumption that a wide and thorough knowledge of God's world is necessary for salvation". This makes it look as if I think that the national curriculum takes the form it does for theological reasons. But my remark was about views held in the 17th century.

Your report fails to pick up my radical doubt about the wisdom of an encyclopaedic education and the emphasis I put on individuals being drawn to some activities and having time to explore them.

If readers would like something more meaningful than your report, I'd be happy to email them my text (

John White, Emeritus professor of philosophy of education, Institute of Education, London.

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today