CVA is a perverse incentive

23rd June 2006 at 01:00
I was delighted to see the positive article ("Full recovery, Teacher magazine, June 16) about the impact on key stage 1 and 2 results of having a trained Reading Recovery teacher in an infant school.

However, I have recently discovered that a couple of all-through primary schools, with new headteachers are considering dropping Reading Recovery in order to focus funding and effort on key stage 2. Every primary head in the land knows why: the use of contextual value-added (CVA) in the inspection system.

What is the point of making sure that every child can read (and read well) in key stage 1 when this means that the value that can subsequently be added in key stage 2 will diminish?

We know that intervening early, in Years 1 and 2, is the key to preventing lifelong literacy difficulties, and that the later you leave it, the harder it gets. Nationally, we need to find a better way of giving schools incentives to make that early investment in children's futures.

Jean Gross

Director, Every Child a Reader

KPMG Foundation

8 Salisbury Square, London EC4

Subscribe to get access to the content on this page.

If you are already a Tes/ Tes Scotland subscriber please log in with your username or email address to get full access to our back issues, CPD library and membership plus page.

Not a subscriber? Find out more about our subscription offers.
Subscribe now
Existing subscriber?
Enter subscription number

Comments

The guide by your side – ensuring you are always up to date with the latest in education.

Get Tes magazine online and delivered to your door. Stay up to date with the latest research, teacher innovation and insight, plus classroom tips and techniques with a Tes magazine subscription.
With a Tes magazine subscription you get exclusive access to our CPD library. Including our New Teachers’ special for NQTS, Ed Tech, How to Get a Job, Trip Planner, Ed Biz Special and all Tes back issues.

Subscribe now