Directors rebuke GTC over quality of new recruits

17th December 1999 at 00:00
Neil Munro reports on the growing tensions over professional incompetence and what to do about it.

THE General Teaching Council for Scotland, to which the Government wants to give new powers to deal with incompetence, stands accused this week of presiding over the admission of weak teachers into the profession.

The charge comes from the Association of Directors of Education which claims the GTC's system of scrutinising probationer teachers is ineffective, complaining that it excludes education authorities and relies on reports from headteachers.

The directors, in their response to the consultation on the GTC, make some hard-hitting criticisms of the GTC's exclusive reliance on reports from headteachers in evaluating the performance of young probationers, which is the basis for deciding whether they should be granted full registration with the council.

The probation system, directors say, is "in urgent need of review". The council is currently conducting a review and Jim McNally, the development officer seconded to carry it out, says the plan is to draw up a standard for full registration, building on the competences already demanded of students entering teacher training.

Support for probationers will also be made more coherent in a new framework. The result, Mr McNally says, should be a clearer indication for heads of what is expected of probationers.

Directors accept there have been improvements but say there is "little reason to believe the system currently operates as was, no doubt, originally intended. As a result, ineffective probationer teachers are by no means always prevented from attaining full registration."

Mr McNally replied that he would like to see the evidence for such a claim.

The ADES points out that the GTC has no staff to carry out its own independent investigations on the quality of probationers.

It continues: "Furthermore, it does not draw on the expertise of, for example, HMI or local authority advisory staff who could provide an independent view. Instead, it relies exclusively on reports from headteachers which do not necessarily apply consistent criteria."

The directors end by calling for significant changes "if the transition from provisional to full registration is to represent valid judgment of professional performance".

Log-in as an existing print or digital subscriber

Forgotten your subscriber ID?


To access this content and the full TES archive, subscribe now.

View subscriber offers


Get TES online and delivered to your door – for less than the price of a coffee

Save 33% off the cover price with this great subscription offer. Every copy delivered to your door by first-class post, plus full access to TES online and the TES app for just £1.90 per week.
Subscribers also enjoy a range of fantastic offers and benefits worth over £270:

  • Discounts off TES Institute courses
  • Access over 200,000 articles in the TES online archive
  • Free Tastecard membership worth £79.99
  • Discounts with Zipcar,, Virgin Wines and other partners
Order your low-cost subscription today